Dear Learners,
RE: My resignation
Firstly, I would like to apologise for stepping into your classroom with my own agenda ā to see if I would like / could teach within the private school system. I left the state syllabus as I had taught it for so long, I desired something new. I wanted to teach in a new environment and make sure I was accurate in my decision of where to settle for my last set of pension earning decades. I made the decision and accepted the post because I believed that God had firmly positioned everything, literally everything, for me to move over and be of service in a new school, with a new group of learners.
Now I sit in major doubt as to how I can serve.
I am well aware of your ability to adapt and adjust and get on with living and doing your tasks. I am sure that you would understand my situation and can carry on fairly unscathed by my actions. After all, I have taught you ā in my brief few months here ā not to let people who do so little for you, control so many of your emotions (courtesy of Mr Will Smith). And that is where I now find myself ā as someone who can do very little for you in your context.
You see, your educative environment is purely āmarkā directed. All of you place your worth and your level of esteem and ability in the hands of your teachers and strangers who apply a letter to your efforts. I hate that. I hate that your efforts are compared and categorised when you are SUCH unique individuals with so many strengths and abilities that cannot and will never be āmarkableā; yet you donāt see it that way. You havenāt been trained to see it that way. You have been trained to take that chronological number that has been assigned to someoneās categories of worth, and you make that assumptive value your personal value. I hate that. You are not the value of some other humanās assessment and judgment of you. Your value is that of gold and silver, refined in THE Refinerās Fire. Sculpted by THE Potterās Hands and sealed in The Kiln of The Most Awesome Creator. Your abilities are limitless. Your talents span the width of your imagination, but therein lies the rub: educators, often people who donāt even believe in themselves, people who have suffered under the same marking system that you are suffering, are in control. I hate that. I hate that people who are not called to teaching, are teaching. They are inflicting their insecurities on you, and contorting you to bend to their whims and their rules and comfort zones by squashing you into the boxes created by random numbers, otherwise known as: Percentages. And you, in your innocence and ignorance as children, accept it. You accept the forces of control and irrationality, and the confines and restrictions the syllabus and system impose on you and brand into you. I hate it.
I sit in this moral conundrum. Who am I to judge? Isnāt it only God who should judge? Who am I to say this is worth an āAā when the learner has been lazy and then just uses Godās Given Talent at the last minute on stage? Who am I to say that the learner who has worked so hard, given everything and stretched themselves into empathy, passion and courage at the highest level, is only worth a āCā because she doesnāt have the acting technique that I prefer? A for Ass, C for Courageousā¦ A for Arrogant, C for Committedā¦ A for Algebra, C for Calculus? The marks assigned by strangers in Drama, for an Exam are meaningless to me, for such reasons. Yet, for you, for my learners, they mean everything. I find it absurd, absolutely absurd.
I find myself now in turmoil over what you expect, what your requirements are for a teacher ā someone who will get you an āAā, when some of you are just not in possession of the āX-Factorā, you are not categorically, by the piece of paper and the blocks I have to tick, an āAāā¦ but your parents, your family, your friends, your teachers who have you as their āpetā, are telling you that you are an āAā. Why do they say that? Because they love you and that is what they see, that is what they know. Because they donāt have assigned tick boxes. Because they have no idea what vocal characterisation is, or what it entails. They donāt have a clue about projection and body dynamic and the technical āhave to haveāsā for an āAā in a Drama Exam. They are right, God has created you as a potential āAā candidate, but that āAā is not in Dramatic Arts in the private school system. In the state system ā yes, there you can get an āAā because your interpretation, your ability to stand cold on a stage and use only yourself to engage with an audience is considered āAā material. It is not so in the private systemā¦ and this is where the private system clashes with ME.
It clashes with my belief in all of you and your incredibly hard work being worth that āAā. It clashes with my belief in the examiner being open to everything s/he sees on stage. It clashes with my belief that an actor with nothing on stage is more powerful than an actor who needs the prop of a propā¦ I can see your soul, your integrity, your truth in the character when it is only you up there, when I am not distracted by a tea-towel in your hand or an item that you throw across the stage. I am not cut off from you when you have a table in front of you. I am not subjected to being an observer of your conversation with a statue on stage. I engage with you, you move my soul, I see your soul has moved, when you interact with me, the soul in the audience who is listening to your message, hearing your words and forming a soulful bond with the character you have taken on in order to take me on a journey. I cannot watch you giving soul on stage and place it in boxes. I cannot tell you that your everything is worth so little, when it is not. I cannot train you in my way, I cannot ask you to act to my style of laying your soul open on stage, when your external examiners want props, want set, want pure type-cast, stereotypical, by-the-book, copy-and-paste, done the same over and over, performances. I am not made that way. I canāt expect every 17/18 year old to contort their body into the assumption that a 50 year old has no strength and must change their body to be āoldā! I canāt force you to assume that you know exactly what a playwright āmadeā a character to be, and that anyone on the planet could recreate a stereotype of something someone else thinks. You are not parrots or monkeys. You are not made to āfakelyā copy another directorās perceptions or preferences. You are you, with your own ideas, your own interpretations, your own directorial perceptions, I cannot and will not force you to lose integrity with yourself to copy and paste your work to be that of someone else.
I am not made to follow man and fit into the whims of mansā insecurities. I walk in the knowing, the absolute conviction, that God has placed me where He has in order to touch souls. In order to awaken the inner light that is so dull inside you, so that you can believe in yourselves, so that you can know the truth of what eternal is. So that you can walk away having experienced something āout of this worldā, something that has allowed you a moment of ātouching Godā; and then gone a step further by giving you a stage, a platform, an audience, to help them touch a moment with God, with themselves and their truths and insecurities, to open their hearts and know that āit is okā, āyou are not aloneāā¦
The problem comes in ā I cannot get you the marks set by this system, this syllabus, purely because I donāt believe in the system or the syllabus. I donāt know how to dance to the tune of materialism and worldly judgment. I only want to dance to the tune of truth, of praise and worship, of love, honesty, sincerity, authenticity and all that is so hard to achieve in our current society.
I sit, disturbed at a very deep level. I sit and type this letter to you in confusion with regards to the rigidity and conformism that I have found is dictated into ART, into an EXPRESSIVE and PERSONAL TO THE CREATOR subject. I am not made in a capacity that can serve you in this āprivate schoolā context. Its non-transparency, for very real reasons I am sure, as I have had to personally deal with you annihilating me for ticking boxes that you disagreed with. I have had your parents annihilate me for not giving you the āAā they āknowā you deserve. I have seen teachers with unhealthy āpreferencesā and completely subjective āreasoningā sway examiners with nonsense to get marks āimprovedā. I know firsthand why non-transparency would be chosenā¦ even so, non-transparency with only ONE examiner is not right or healthy. It is secretive and beyond subjective. The State system, with its full transparency, will have a minimum of two external examiners and then open discussions with teachers, thus often having four examiners deciding on a mark. This is healthy, this is objective, this eliminates personal preference and personal subjectivity. One examiner, on a bad day, could skew an entire set of marks. One examiner who does not like a particular style, or has his/her own agenda can completely whitewash a year to poor marks because s/he ādidnāt like itā, or has āseen it done betterā, āor preferred the movieā or āwas raped herself and that is not what it looks or feels likeā, or āI havenāt studied dance, or danced myself (Iām not that talented) but I wouldnāt say that was goodā… Sub-conscious jealousies, personal agendas, self-righteousness, lack of understanding of a piece; all of those can factor into a single āexaminerā and how s/he allocates his/her personal choice of marksā¦ I donāt believe it is right or fair to have one solo adjudicator who bears the burden of allocating marks without confirmation from another, and who gets sole control over setting a judgment over another human beingās creative work.
I find myself despondent, at my wits end trying to work through this, trying to fathom how I can work in such an unfair and distorted system. This is why I am resigning my dear children. I donāt want to be aligning you with my dreams and goals and lighting your souls, when your goals are the marks given by one person, in one moment, making one judgment call on you. I am not in the business of teaching for marks, of teaching to make some single other person able to put you in a box, āthe best boxā; because I donāt believe in āboxingā anyoneās creative effortsā¦
I have also now encountered a horror of truth in the examination assessment that I have had to live through. In the feedback I asked for help, because I had been told that I had to tell you what to do. . . a.k.a. āDirect you.ā Me? That if you arenāt working, if you arenāt getting the interpretation that the examiner wants from you (bearing in mind that I am not even told what that interpretation or expectation is with regards to what marks they assign ā so I am expected to orientate myself around some invisible āstandardā / āexpectationā); then it is my āfaultā ā so ā¦ this means that your exam mark, your ticked box has nothing to do with your performance and everything to do with MY directing! Who is the most important part of any play? āThe Directorā. Who is the cog in any show? āThe Directorā. Who gets nailed with the criticism and torn to pieces if a play is ābadā (as dictated by some person ticking their own random preference boxes)? āThe Directorā.Ā Itās so completely twisted that I would be required to tell you how to act on stage and then MARK MYSELF! I am not into teaching practical Dramatic Arts to have myself come in and tell other people what to do. I did not go to University to become a Director; I studied my second qualification to TEACH. The goal of this teacher is to create INDEPENDENT, self-aware, capable to handle the real world learners, not DEPENDENT on me human beingsā¦ Yes, there are wiser people than ourselves out there, yes, we go to others for advice, yes, input from others is always advisable, but telling others what to do and how to do it? Surely notā¦ What happens when my poor direction then reduces a learner to have lower marks because I didnāt notice something? Then, what about when you refuse to listen to my direction? When you do what you feel like and then I get slammed for it? Not fair, not ārightā.
On top of all this, apparently, if learners donāt type up their programmes, then I must do it for them? What the? What on earth is that teaching any child? If you donāt do your work, itās ok, someone else will do it for you and because that other person does it so well, you can get a great mark and call it āmy markā? How is that healthy? Helpful? Truthful? I am not employed to be a slave, or someone who is going to take on all responsibility for people who are apathetic and couldnāt careā¦ I am not made to hide mistakes and flaws, I want them revealed, I want consequences for actions and behaviour to happen. I want learners to learn to be responsible for their own work, their own future, their own lives.
This in totality means, I do not fit the private school system. It means my values; my ethic and my purpose do not align with the methodology and learning system that you (and your parents) have chosen for your education. It means I am not fit to provide the service you are expecting or the mark alignment and mark affirmations that you crave and build your lives around. It means I am not fit to be your Dramatic Arts teacher.
You are amazing learners and the potential within you to become awesome adults is great. I truly wish and pray that you know it, see it, believe it and become proud of yourselves; and that you achieve in fabulous ways in all the years aheadā¦ how you gauge and assess your level of achievementā¦ well, I hope it is not by some tick box or the ratings of some āBodyā that some humans have declared āimportantā. I hope that your assessment of yourselves lies purely in the depth of your Souls and how you engage with YOUR FATHER IN HEAVEN. In the darkest part of the night may you be able to say: āIt is wellā, āIt is goodā, āI am content, I am at peace, I have served a mighty purpose, and an amazing God in a loving, kind, true and eternally pleasing way todayā. Amen.
Stay blessed and know you are Loved,
Sir.